"Wasting time since 1829!"
Wednesday, December 3, 2008

« Earlier articles Later articles »

8/20/2004

Jabberwocky Redux: Are we geek enough now?

Filed under: by VeryVito at 2:03 am — [Tag on del.icio.us]

We're still scratching our heads over what happened this week.

It started simply enough: I was avoiding real work — this time on the latest Li'l Johnny's Adventure game, and I happened to write a few lines of Actionscript code based upon Lewis Carroll's nonsense poem, "The Jabberwocky." Turns out, a couple of my coworkers liked the piece, so I put it up on Turdhead for the world to ignore.

But this time, thanks to a brief article on Slashdot, something happened: The hitherto-unknown Turdhead.com apparently and inadvertently had lobbed a grenade into an existing turf battle between the fledgling Actionscript programming community and the more established "traditional" programming legions (who apparently take the title of "geek" pretty seriously!). The Actionscript crowd seemed to love it, and many other people — programmers and pedestrians alike — also had good things to say. The "Actionscript Jabberwocky" caused a few smiles, and that was its intended purpose.

But… we were amazed to see that some of the Java/C/Assembly/Logo programmers that stopped by actually seemed to LOATHE the idea that someone would dare to write in something as… well… unfamiliar, I guess… as Macromedia's ever-evolving Actionscript language.

Truth is, we never intended "The Actionscript Jabberwocky" to be a battle cry. We just happen to be writing more Actionscript than Perl these days, and we think it's a great little language for what it does. Perl and C already HAVE their literary programming traditions (The obfuscated programming contests, and the Perl poetry prizes), and we never claimed to be geeks, anyway: We're turdheads.

But in an effort to appease these "real" programmers, We decided to go back to our roots — back to ALL of our roots, and to create another bit of Jabberwocky poetry that should bring us all together as one (or perhaps as zero).

And with this, I give you: "The Binary Jabberwocky." May we all go in peace!

And as I mentioned before, we'd love for you to drop us a line! And, of course, you can also get your own copy of the gigantic Binary Jabberwocky poster, print or T-shirt here.

You can also purchase the orginal ActionScript Jabberwocky on a poster, T-shirt, mouse pad or baby, too!

Note: You may also want to check out the original article to see what wrought this madness.

Print this article Print this article

One Response to “Jabberwocky Redux: Are we geek enough now?”

  1. Jabberwocky ReduxJabberwocky Redux: Last week’s ActionScript Jabberwocky got Slashdotted and such… good thing it was just a 150K JPG file instead of something with audio, or else bandwidth costs might have been high. Anyway, VeryVito is apparently very sorry to have…



So what do you think?

Please note that to protect our readers from spammers and other sleazeballs, we moderate all comments on this board. (And be assured, we'd sooner die than sell, give away or otherwise sully the reputation of your email address!)





Your message may not appear immediately upon submission, as we have to read it first to make sure you're not a machine selling poker sites, mortgages or Cialis. If you're a real person, though, we'd love to hear from you! Just fill out the form above.


« Earlier articles Later articles »

 

Shameless begging, panhandling and soul-sucking indignity

Want to show your appreciation for Turdhead.com, its products or services? Although it's certainly not necessary, we'd be pleased as punch if you felt like donating any amount you'd like, or even if you just wanted to give us a nod on Digg.com. Honestly, we have no pride whatsoever (the name of the site is Turdhead.com, after all), and we'll take any recognition we can get for our efforts here.

 


 

Search

Or use Blingo! to search and win prizes.



Get Chitika eMiniMalls

Design and Sell Merchandise Online for Free

Copyright © 2004-2008 by Turdhead.com. All rights reserved. So there. Questions? Write us!
But first, get a load of these cryptic yet official looking numbers:
[ 1608111v | 176p | 855c | s | 12.29.05d ]