<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T, You suck.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.turdhead.com/2009/06/08/att-you-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.turdhead.com/2009/06/08/att-you-suck/</link>
	<description>For geeks with social skills!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 09:31:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeryVito</title>
		<link>http://www.turdhead.com/2009/06/08/att-you-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-64575</link>
		<dc:creator>VeryVito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turdhead.com/?p=224#comment-64575</guid>
		<description>Tethering I understand, but MMS?? Come on, all their other phones already handle this, and every other carrier handling the iPhone has managed to get their ducks in a row on this.  Was AT&amp;T seriously surprised at the last minute by the announcement of MMS? Doubtful.

How much time does an exclusive provider need to get things done? I&#039;ll bet it&#039;s a lot longer than if they had other competition in this market. 

As for the Pre, time will tell, but I have to agree the lack of an AT&amp;T service contract is appealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tethering I understand, but MMS?? Come on, all their other phones already handle this, and every other carrier handling the iPhone has managed to get their ducks in a row on this.  Was AT&amp;T seriously surprised at the last minute by the announcement of MMS? Doubtful.</p>
<p>How much time does an exclusive provider need to get things done? I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;s a lot longer than if they had other competition in this market. </p>
<p>As for the Pre, time will tell, but I have to agree the lack of an AT&amp;T service contract is appealing.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_64575"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 64575 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_64575"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.turdhead.com/2009/06/08/att-you-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-64570</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turdhead.com/?p=224#comment-64570</guid>
		<description>While AT&amp;T might have looked like they dropped the ball here, they have to upgrade their entire network quickly to enable MMS and tethering. It will be here, just a little late. If you don&#039;t like it, enjoy your Pre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While AT&amp;T might have looked like they dropped the ball here, they have to upgrade their entire network quickly to enable MMS and tethering. It will be here, just a little late. If you don&#8217;t like it, enjoy your Pre.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_64570"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 64570 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_64570"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
