"Ineffective since 1927!"
Thursday, August 21, 2008

« Earlier pages

10/30/2007

Wow. “Stacks” really sucks!

Filed under: by VeryVito at 8:32 am — [Tag on del.icio.us]

Check out more recent articles to see how I stopped worrying and learned to love the Stacks.

I've been enjoying my first few days with the new OS X 10.5 operating system (aka Leopard), and I'm really looking forward to seeing what the development community is going to be able to do with the hundreds of cool new features and API hooks built into the OS. But that said: Does anybody really think that the "Stacks" feature has been well implemented in Leopard?

I was actually looking forward to using Stacks: Along with Time Machine (which it turns out is currently useless on my existing network storage system), it was one of the things that drew me to buy the latest upgrade as soon as possible. But it turns out that "stacks" are just folders — not smart folders, and not "on the fly" collections of files. Just folders. And really, really, really sh*tty looking ones, at that.

What the hell are these supposed to be? I challenge anyone to identify these folders!

I won't go into details here, as I'm sure anyone looking for more info will find it in abundance elsewhere on the Web (The entire Ars Technica review is a great read, by the way).

In fact, Leopard is indeed a great system, but the two main things that Apple has been using to promote it to the masses — Time Machine and Stacks — have turned out to be sorely disappointing. I'm sure somebody will figure out a way to get Time Machine to work on a networked drive soon enough, so I'm not actually worried about that one. After all, we've already seen "fixes" for other features, such as this fix to disable the miserable 3D Dock.

But Stacks? Stacks just sucks.

Print this article Print this article


10/26/2007

My first 15 minutes with OS X Leopard

Filed under: by VeryVito at 12:58 pm — [Tag on del.icio.us]

This will be short, as I'm still exploring, but I just wanted to report a few things I've noticed in the whole 15 minutes since I installed the new OS X operating system on my MacBook Pro (Keep in mind I never tried a beta version, so this is all new to me):

  1. jEdit actually looks really nice in Leopard! Apparently, the unified look-and-feel works well for Java apps, too.
  2. Sherlock is gone. I'm probably the only person in the world that still used it, but I really liked to use it as a small Web-service client. (Sure, I liked Watson even better, but that's been MIA since Sun bought it from Karelia oh so many years ago). Oh well, all the more reason to write my own WSDL apps now.
  3. Already, I can tell I'm going to like Spaces and Stacks.
  4. Not so sure I really dig the shadows and lighting overall. The new icons are reminiscent of classic Mac icons to me (The "Aqua look" is obviously out now), which gives the whole Finder a snappy feel.
  5. I've got

to go find that app that turns off the menu bar transparency. That's just a lot more annoying than it seemed it would be. (Update: How about that? It doesn't work anymore. Oh well, it was easy enough to fix by adding a white bar to the desktop picture itself..)

  • I've seen demos of Time Machine, and I want to love it, but… anybody know how to get it to work with a network drive? So far I'm only seeing my USB and Firewire drives in the list. (Update: Looking around on the Web for about 5 minutes, it seems it may not work with a networked drive. Well, ain't that a kick in crotch?)
  • Hour 4 edit: Woohoo!!! Leopard lets me control my icon grid spacing! This is a feature that's been sorely lacking in the Finder, and I'm thrilled to have it now! (It's always the little things.)
  • I'll probably add more to this post as I find new things, but so far, I like it. I really, really like it.

    Print this article Print this article


    9/25/2007

    I’m actually happy with my ActionScript editor… on OS X!

    jEdit as ActionScript editor

    After years of lamenting the lack of a good editor on OS X, I've actually found something that's working — and working well — for me. For everybody who has tried jEdit in the past… it's time to try it again. I've been hammering away on it lately, adapting it to the workflow I developed using SEPY and FlashDevelop on Windows, and I think I've actually got an editor I could learn to love — on any platform I'd ever want! (It runs on Mac, PC, Linux, BSD, etc.)

    Once I'm happy with my modifications, macros and overall setup, I'll share my changes here. Meanwhile, give it a shot if you're still looking for the perfect editor — It's MUCH better than it was a couple years ago!

    It's still not quite as fun to use as FlashDevelop on the PC, but it's getting there. Unlike Eclipse, it doesn't define your workflow (requiring projects and workspaces to be set up before you can even start editing), and unlike TextMate, it actually feels more like the great AS editors I miss from my Windows days.

    Kudos to the jEdit developers for a great job so far. Next step: Complete ActionScript 3.0 integration with its snazzy Sidekick plugin.

    Print this article Print this article


    9/13/2007

    In search of the perfect cell phone

    Filed under: by VeryVito at 2:53 pm — [Tag on del.icio.us]

    In the next few weeks, I'm planning to upgrade my trusty Verizon LG-8100, and I figured I'd ask if anyone here has any recommendations for a good Flash-enabled cell phone. My requirements don't seem too demanding, but unfortunately, finding a good fit hasn't been easy in the past. Here's what I need:

    1. Must be supported by Verizon (So no iPhone. Sorry AT&T, but, um… I still haven't forgiven you for last time).
    2. Must support Flash Lite (Again, no iPhone. What the heck, Apple?) I'm really ready to sink my teeth into Web app development now, but without a phone that supports Flash, it's

    hard to get motivated. And now the kicker…

  • Must be fully integrated with Apple's iSync utility (I'm tired of third-party "fixes" that aren't quite what I need, which is full integration with Address Book, iCal etc.) I switched back to Mac again recently, and this time I plan to stay.
  • I'm leaning toward the Motola RAZR line, but I'm open to suggestions, and searching the usual sources online has just left me more confused. Finding one phone that supports SOME of the above needs is easy; finding the magic device that meets all three, on the other hand…

    Any recommendations?

    Print this article Print this article


    8/22/2007

    Putting the B back in “Beta”

    Filed under: by VeryVito at 11:14 pm — [Tag on del.icio.us]

    From the looks of comments on VersionTracker and elsewhere on the Web, some users are experiencing some pretty significant problems with the latest Flash Player 9 beta, version 9.0.60.184 (Really? We're using all FOUR sets of digits in publicly available version numbers?)

    Granted, this is still a Beta test version, but when it shows up on common download sites — especially without the big word "BETA" after the version number — people tend to download first and ask questions later (in this case, a lot of questions). And when it "crashes the internet," they

    tend to remember the product ("Flash") rather than the version number.

    So while I'm excited about the new video capabilities of the latest Flash player, I also hope we'll all remember to warn our clients that indeed, it IS still a beta version, and yes, their mileage may vary. (And for the overzealous and underwhelmed, an uninstaller is also available here.)

    And, ahem, perhaps Adobe might want to add the word "beta" to the evergrowing version number as well (and mention it on the installation splash screen, perhaps)? Apparently, there is a "ub" in the filename itself, but… as someone just asked me earlier tonight, "How was I supposed to get 'beta' out of that?!"

    Print this article Print this article


     

    Shameless begging, panhandling and soul-sucking indignity

    Want to show your appreciation for Turdhead.com, its products or services? Although it's certainly not necessary, we'd be pleased as punch if you felt like donating any amount you'd like, or even if you just wanted to give us a nod on Digg.com. Honestly, we have no pride whatsoever (the name of the site is Turdhead.com, after all), and we'll take any recognition we can get for our efforts here.

     


    « Earlier pages

     

    Search

    Or use Blingo! to search and win prizes.



    Get Chitika eMiniMalls

    Design and Sell Merchandise Online for Free

    Copyright © 2004-2008 by Turdhead.com. All rights reserved. So there. Questions? Write us!
    But first, get a load of these cryptic yet official looking numbers:
    [ 1498796v | 175p | 851c | s | 12.29.05d ]